Vario 1918 Trench BrassvsWilliam Wood Triumph Chronograph
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
9 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Vario 1918 Trench Brass vs William Wood Triumph Chronograph gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Vario 1918 Trench Brass for its attractive, precisely made dial and case, with the evolving brass patina noted as a positive feature. The bund strap is considered comfortable and well-fitting by some, though others find it stiff and short for larger wrists. The lume is considered poor. The Miyota 82s5 movement is described as adequate, with accuracy ranging from about -10 seconds per day to simply running slow. On balance, owners rate the Vario 1918 Trench Brass highly for its fantastic looks and the unique character of its brass case.
The William Wood Triumph Chronograph is a Swiss-made chronograph featuring a 41mm stainless steel case and a Sellita SW510 movement. Reviewers highlight its firefighting-inspired design, including a sandwich dial, unique sub-dials, and upcycled fire hose straps. The watch has a 48-hour power reserve, though the movement is often credited with up to 56 hours. Its 16.5mm height and 49.5mm lug-to-lug measurement mean it wears large on a 7-inch wrist, and the handset is described as flat and blocky. Overall, reviewers appreciate the novel design elements and thematic execution of the William Wood Triumph Chronograph.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










