Tissot PR 100vsVaer Calendar Field

Owners widely praise the Tissot PR 100 for its exceptional value, with many noting its sapphire crystal, robust build, and attractive design. The Powermatic 80 variants are particularly lauded for their 80-hour power reserve and accuracy, with some reporting deviations as low as +/- 1-2 seconds per day. Owners appreciate the clean dials and practical clasps, finding the 39mm and 40mm sizes versatile. However, some owners report the crystal easily picks up fingerprints, and the stainless steel case and bracelet can show scratches or wear over time, with one instance of a bracelet falling apart after five years. Some also note that only the hands have lume, and the seconds hand may not perfectly align with markers on certain quartz models. Overall, owners rate the Tissot PR 100 highly for its impressive value and solid construction, making it a well-regarded entry-level Swiss timepiece.

Owners widely praise the Vaer Calendar Field for its excellent value, citing its clean WWII-inspired dial, thin 8.5mm to 9.5mm case, sapphire crystal, and 100m water resistance. The dial and hand design are consistently highlighted as phenomenal, with case finishing described as next-level for the price, featuring nice brushing. Some owners note the second hand does not perfectly align with markers, and the stock silicone strap attracts lint. One owner found the lume only serviceable and wished the date window was brighter. On balance, owners rate the Vaer Calendar Field highly for its exceptional dial design and case finishing at its price point.