Studio Underd0g Guacamole (Gen3)vsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
14 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Studio Underd0g Guacamole (Gen3) vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Studio Underd0g Guacamole (Gen3) for its fun, cheerful, and unusual design with great colors, and one owner found its actual wrist presence perfect. Some owners, however, find the dial printing tacky and the overall design looking cheap, while others feel it is a bit pricey for what is offered. The pushers lack crispness, and the crystal is very reflective and domed too much at the edges. One owner expresses concern that it uses a Seagull ST91-B movement, known for a high failure rate. On balance, owners are split on the value proposition of the Studio Underd0g Guacamole (Gen3) at its current price point, with some appreciating its unique aesthetic and others finding the design and movement choices underwhelming.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









