Side by side

Grand Seiko SLGW007vsLongines LEGEND DIVER 42

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

SLGW007
Grand SeikoSLGW007
MSRP $10,000
LEGEND DIVER 42
LonginesLEGEND DIVER 42
MSRP $2,850

At a glance

14 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
SLGW00738.6mm
LEGEND DIVER 4242mm
Power Reserve
SLGW00780h
LEGEND DIVER 4272h
Water Resistance
SLGW00730m
LEGEND DIVER 42300m
MSRP
SLGW007$10,000
LEGEND DIVER 42$2,850

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Dress
Diver
Diameter
38.6mm
42mm
Thickness
9.95mm
12.7mm
Lug-to-Lug
45mm
52.6mm
Lug Width
20mm
22mm
Water Resistance
30m
300m

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
AR Coating
Yes
Both sides
Dial Color
Black
Blue
Lume
None
Super-LumiNova

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
9SA4
L888.5
Type
Manual
Automatic
Beat Rate
28,800 vph
25,200 vph
Power Reserve
80h
72h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$10,000
$2,850

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Grand Seiko SLGW007 vs Longines LEGEND DIVER 42 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Grand Seiko SLGW007

Grand Seiko SLGW007 owners and reviewers praise its compact 38.6mm x 9.95mm Evolution 9 case and the textured "Moonlit Birch" dial, described as moody, elegant, and captivating. The technically credible 9SA4 hand-wound movement with an 80-hour power reserve is also highlighted. Its 30m water resistance and lack of lume are noted as appropriate for a dress watch. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Grand Seiko SLGW007 highly for its refined case, captivating dial, and updated movement.

Longines LEGEND DIVER 42

Owners widely praise the Longines Legend Diver 42 for its appealing retro skin-diver aesthetic, excellent legibility, and functional inner bezel, with reviewers noting its strong value proposition below $2,500 and capability in shallow dives. Some owners find the blue dial pops in the sun and appreciate the quickset date. However, several owners report disappointment after seeing the watch in person, finding it underwhelming and lacking dial depth. Specific criticisms include original leather straps peeling easily, a clasp that scratches readily, dust getting on the dial, and lume that is not particularly strong or matching vintage charm. The 50mm lug-to-lug length is noted as potentially overwhelming for smaller wrists, and one owner experienced the minute hand scratching the hour hand. Accuracy figures are not consistently reported across sources.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.