CWC SBS 1987 Aged SpecialvsDOXA SUB 600T
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
4 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
1 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when CWC SBS 1987 Aged Special vs DOXA SUB 600T gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the CWC SBS 1987 Aged Special for its rugged build and military heritage, with some finding its quality comparable to higher-end watches. A reviewer notes the 41mm PVD-coated watch features a bright SuperLuminova dial. One owner reports a bit of play in the 60-click bezel, present from new, alongside minor wear on the PVD coating and bezel insert. On balance, owners rate the CWC SBS 1987 Aged Special highly for its rugged build and military heritage, despite some questioning its value at £700.
The DOXA SUB 600T is widely praised for its purposeful, angular, and unique 80s-inspired aesthetic, available in a variety of saturated dial colors and bezel options. Reviewers and owners highlight its tactile bezel action, grippy crown, and improved lume compared to previous models. However, multiple sources identify the excessively tall and blocky case back as a significant shortcoming, leading to a top-heavy feel and tendency to shift on the wrist, with some owners questioning its wearability on smaller wrists. The Sellita SW200-1 movement's 38-hour power reserve is also noted as underwhelming for the price point, and strap/clasp adjustments can be challenging for a comfortable fit. On balance, owners and reviewers appreciate the DOXA SUB 600T's distinctive tool watch character and vibrant colorways, despite the noted wearability and movement power reserve concerns.
The DOXA SUB 600T's angular case design and robust brushed finish are notable features. The watch's price point is relatively high compared to its competitors. Reviewers disagree on the watch's water resistance, with one reviewer noting it's somewhat limited, while the other reviewer doesn't mention this.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










