Pagani Design PD-1762 GMT II NH34vsVario 1918 Medic Brass
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
10 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Pagani Design PD-1762 GMT II NH34 vs Vario 1918 Medic Brass gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Pagani Design PD-1762 GMT II NH34 for its smoother winding and time-setting experience thanks to the NH34 movement, a comfortable 40mm case size, and brighter BGW-9 lume. However, one owner finds the bulbous hour indices and clasp quality to be a turn-off, noting metal debris in the clasp's micro-adjust holes, while another flags the milled clasp's folding section as stiff, suggesting a potential quality control issue. On balance, owners appreciate the improved wearability and lume of the Pagani Design PD-1762 GMT II NH34, though some specific components like the clasp and indices draw criticism.
Owners widely praise the Vario 1918 Medic Brass for its crisp enamel dial, easy-to-read numerals, and cathedral hands, noting the brass case develops an attractive patina over time. However, the soft brass scratches easily, and one owner found the lume to be poor. Accuracy varies, with one example running slow by about 10 seconds per day and another owner deeming the Miyota 82s5 movement just okay. On balance, owners rate the Vario 1918 Medic Brass highly for its unique dial and the evolving character of its brass case.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











