Pagani Design PD-1758 GMTvsPhoibos Eagle Ray No Date
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
8 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
3 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Pagani Design PD-1758 GMT vs Phoibos Eagle Ray No Date gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Pagani Design PD-1758 GMT owners widely praise its value, with many calling it a bargain for its price, citing the Seiko NH34 movement, sapphire crystal, and overall build quality for the money. The maroon aluminum bezel is frequently highlighted as attractive, though some find the 24-hour numbers difficult to read. Owners report varying accuracy, from +7 seconds per day to approximately -6 seconds per day. Criticisms include a unidirectional bezel lacking bidirectional GMT functionality, a serviceable but thin jubilee bracelet with a "janky" clasp, and occasional minor quality control issues like a misaligned cyclops or loose dial markers. Overall, owners rate the Pagani Design PD-1758 GMT highly for its impressive specifications and attractive design at an accessible price point.
Owners widely praise the Phoibos Eagle Ray No Date for its value at the price point. One owner notes the watch is a great purchase with no regrets, and is unbothered by its lume. The Phoibos Eagle Ray No Date features a 41mm steel case and a Miyota 9015 automatic movement with a 42-hour power reserve. However, one owner received a non-working watch and reported difficulty obtaining a refund, citing horrible customer service. On balance, owners rate the Phoibos Eagle Ray No Date well for its value, though customer service experiences can vary.
The Phoibos Eagle Ray No Date features a high-beat Miyota 9015 movement, which is a notable strength. A weakness of the watch is its relatively weak lume brightness. Reviewers disagree on whether the added features of the Ceramic model justify the extra cost, with one reviewer finding it worth the extra cost and another noting it's a trade-off for the No Date model.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











