Side by side

Pagani Design PD-1695vsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

PD-1695
Pagani DesignPD-1695
MSRP $145
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
TissotSeastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
MSRP $1,375

At a glance

9 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
PD-169545mm
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT46mm
Power Reserve
PD-169542h
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT80h
Water Resistance
PD-1695300m
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT300m
MSRP
PD-1695$145
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT$1,375

Full specifications

Case

3 specs
Category
Diver
GMT
Diameter
45mm
46mm
Thickness
15mm
15.4mm

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
Domed
Indices
Applied
Indexes
Lume
None
Super-LumiNova ®

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
Miyota 8215
Powermatic 80
Power Reserve
42h
80h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$145
$1,375

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Pagani Design PD-1695 vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Pagani Design PD-1695

Owners widely praise the Pagani Design PD-1695 for its appealing blue dial and wearability, with some finding it wears smaller than its dimensions suggest due to its lug placement. The 300m water resistance is noted as a functional benefit. However, some owners find the lume to be weak. On balance, owners rate the Pagani Design PD-1695 highly for its attractive dial and perceived value as a placeholder for more expensive timepieces.

Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT

Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.