Side by side

Pagani Design PD-1717vsLongines LEGEND DIVER 42

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

PD-1717
Pagani DesignPD-1717
MSRP $158
LEGEND DIVER 42
LonginesLEGEND DIVER 42
MSRP $2,850

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
PD-171738mm
LEGEND DIVER 4242mm
Power Reserve
PD-171742h
LEGEND DIVER 4272h
Water Resistance
PD-1717200m
LEGEND DIVER 42300m
MSRP
PD-1717$158
LEGEND DIVER 42$2,850

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
38mm
42mm
Thickness
13mm
12.7mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
52.6mm
Lug Width
20mm
22mm
Water Resistance
200m
300m

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
AR Coating
Yes
Both sides
Dial Color
Black
Blue
Lume
None
Super-LumiNova

Movement

3 specs
Caliber
Miyota 8215
L888.5
Beat Rate
28,800 vph
25,200 vph
Power Reserve
42h
72h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$158
$2,850

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Pagani Design PD-1717 vs Longines LEGEND DIVER 42 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Pagani Design PD-1717

Pagani Design PD-1717 owners widely praise its value for money and competent finishing, highlighting its admirable lug drop and unique dial step. However, reviewers and owners consistently note its weak lume and a 13mm thickness. Some owners report ill-fitting end links and disappointing AR coating. Overall, owners rate the Pagani Design PD-1717 highly for its impressive value and competent finishing at its price point.

Longines LEGEND DIVER 42

Owners widely praise the Longines Legend Diver 42 for its appealing retro skin-diver aesthetic, excellent legibility, and functional inner bezel, with reviewers noting its strong value proposition below $2,500 and capability in shallow dives. Some owners find the blue dial pops in the sun and appreciate the quickset date. However, several owners report disappointment after seeing the watch in person, finding it underwhelming and lacking dial depth. Specific criticisms include original leather straps peeling easily, a clasp that scratches readily, dust getting on the dial, and lume that is not particularly strong or matching vintage charm. The 50mm lug-to-lug length is noted as potentially overwhelming for smaller wrists, and one owner experienced the minute hand scratching the hour hand. Accuracy figures are not consistently reported across sources.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.