Marloe Watch Company Motorsport 105vsStudio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marloe Watch Company Motorsport 105 vs Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Marloe Watch Company Motorsport 105 for its creative dial design, good contrast, and British Racing Green color, with some finding it wears smaller than its 41mm size. One owner appreciates its lack of a date window and comfortable wear on a 6.5” wrist. However, some users note Marloe's 20mm lug width can make models appear top-heavy, and a significant price increase has been observed across the brand's offerings. Overall, owners rate the Marloe Watch Company Motorsport 105 highly for its distinctive dial design and comfortable wearability.
The Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar is a polarizing monopusher chronograph with a unique dial design inspired by luxury food and drink, featuring a textured champagne top dial and a caviar-themed subdial. Owners and reviewers are split on its aesthetic, with some calling the design "so fucking bad" and "gross," while others appreciate its "awesome" concept. It is powered by a manual-wind Sellita SW510M Elaboré movement with a 63-hour power reserve and is rated at ±5 seconds per day, housed in a 38.5mm stainless steel case and priced at $2,200. On balance, the Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar is a unique but divisive chronograph, with its polarizing design being the primary point of contention among enthusiasts and reviewers.
The Studio Underd0g Standard's Sellita SW210-1 automatic movement offers a 42-hour power reserve. The watch's build quality is a notable weakness, with reviewers mentioning that it's not as well-polished as its competitors. Reviewers disagree on the watch's value, with one reviewer comparing it to the Gibson Les Paul and another noting its price is more accessible than the standard Brunswick.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.