Marathon JDD (Jumbo Day/Date) Anthracite Diver's AutomaticvsTissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon JDD (Jumbo Day/Date) Anthracite Diver's Automatic vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Marathon JDD (Jumbo Day/Date) Anthracite Diver's Automatic as a tough, underrated tool watch with lifestyle appeal, highlighting its robust build and tritium lume for excellent legibility. However, its 46mm size is a common criticism, with some finding it heavy and top-heavy, and the OEM rubber strap stiff. One owner noted the watch runs about 10 seconds fast after three days, and the ETA 2836-2 movement offers approximately two days of power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Marathon JDD (Jumbo Day/Date) Anthracite Diver's Automatic highly for its robust tool-watch build and legibility, despite its substantial size.
The Tissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph is widely praised for its excellent value, solid build, and 300m water resistance, making it a capable summer watch. Owners appreciate its comfortable size, with one noting the 40mm variant as a "just right" fit, and others highlighting the attractive mineral bezels and throwback aesthetics of certain colorways. The watch features adequate lume on the dial and hands, with a green lume pip on the bezel, and a screw-down crown with decent grip. However, some criticisms have been raised. Reviewers and owners note a non-reflective crystal that can cause glare, mediocre lume in general, and excessive polishing on the case. The bracelet and clasp are frequently described as rattly and flimsy, with one owner finding the 19mm lug width too thin. There are also comments about a busy dial, ill-proportioned hands and indices, and a bezel that can be hard to read in certain light.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











