Side by side

Lorier ZephyrvsTissot Seastar 2000

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Zephyr
LorierZephyr
MSRP $549
Seastar 2000
TissotSeastar 2000
MSRP $1,275

At a glance

14 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Zephyr36mm
Seastar 200046mm
Power Reserve
Zephyr40h
Seastar 200080h
Water Resistance
Zephyr
Seastar 2000600m
MSRP
Zephyr$549
Seastar 2000$1,275

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Dress
Diver
Diameter
36mm
46mm
Thickness
16.25mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
Lug Width
18mm
22mm
Water Resistance
600m

Crystal & Dial

5 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
Domed
AR Coating
Inner
Yes
Dial Color
White
Graded blue-black
Indices
Applied
Indexes
Lume
None
Super-LumiNova ®

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
Powermatic 80
Power Reserve
40h
80h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$549
$1,275

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Lorier Zephyr vs Tissot Seastar 2000 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Lorier Zephyr

Owners widely praise the Lorier Zephyr for its stunning guilloche-style dial, refined and perfectly sized unique case shape, and comfortable wearability. The Miyota 9 series movement is noted by owners as being a little noisy, with a rotor whirring audible on quick hand movements. On balance, owners rate the Lorier Zephyr highly for its distinctive dial and case design at the price.

From video reviewers

The watch's vintage aesthetic and value for money are praised. The bracelet's refinement and perceived rattle are noted as a drawback.

Tissot Seastar 2000

Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 2000 for its impressive specifications at its price point, including an 80-hour power reserve, ISO 6425 certification, sapphire crystal, ceramic bezel, and 600m water resistance, with its dial quality and finishing considered superior for its class. The blue dial is frequently highlighted as particularly sharp and legible. However, the watch's substantial size and weight are consistent drawbacks; its 46mm width, 16.3mm thickness, and 52mm lug-to-lug dimension make it too large for some for everyday wear, with a rubber strap often recommended over the metal bracelet for comfort. A significant concern raised by multiple owners is the bezel's tendency to become loose and lose its click, with one reporting this on two separate watches. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner noting +1 second per day and another around +5 seconds per day.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.