Side by side

Lorier Neptune SIVvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Neptune SIV
LorierNeptune SIV
MSRP $599
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Neptune SIV39mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Neptune SIV40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Neptune SIV200m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Neptune SIV$599
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Category
Diver
Dress
Diameter
39mm
38mm
Thickness
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
Water Resistance
200m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Standard
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$599
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Lorier Neptune SIV vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Lorier Neptune SIV

Owners widely praise the Lorier Neptune SIV for its versatile, vintage-inspired design featuring a glossy gilt-style dial and a comfortable, tapered bracelet, noting its affordability reduces wear anxiety. Reviewers and owners alike mention the acrylic crystal as a point of contention, with some preferring sapphire, and one owner finds the bracelet lacks the feel of more expensive options. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Lorier Neptune SIV highly for its appealing vintage aesthetic and value proposition.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.