Lorier Hyperion SII SkywardvsSternglas Naos Automatik Edition 60
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Lorier Hyperion SII Skyward vs Sternglas Naos Automatik Edition 60 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Lorier Hyperion SII Skyward for its comfortable, thin, and light wearability, with one owner noting a perfect case width and another highlighting its 10.7mm thickness. The bi-directional GMT bezel is described as decent for its price, and the movement is considered fine and accurate, making it a low-key travel watch. The bracelet is also noted as well-made and finished for the price. On balance, owners rate the Lorier Hyperion SII Skyward highly for its comfortable wearability and value as a mechanical GMT.
Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Automatik Edition 60 for its slim 9mm case, Bauhaus design, alabaster dial, and well-proportioned hands, noting it offers good value and a sophisticated look. Some owners find the movement audible and the 38mm case wears smaller than expected, while others feel the brand lacks heritage compared to established names. One owner reports the sapphire crystal remained scratch-free after two years of daily wear. Overall, owners rate the Sternglas Naos Automatik Edition 60 highly for its attractive Bauhaus styling and affordable price point.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.