Farer GMTvsWilliam Wood Triumph Chronograph
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
10 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Farer GMT vs William Wood Triumph Chronograph gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Farer GMT Automatic is praised for its vibrant, legible sea-green sunburst dial and well-proportioned 39.5mm, 10mm thin case. The Top Grade ETA 2893-2 movement offers hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve. Reviewers note the bronze crown, intended to develop patina, as a potentially unpopular design choice. Overall, reviewers consider the Farer GMT Automatic good value at its price point, highlighting the dial and case proportions as key strengths.
The William Wood Triumph Chronograph is a Swiss-made chronograph featuring a 41mm stainless steel case and a Sellita SW510 movement. Reviewers highlight its firefighting-inspired design, including a sandwich dial, unique sub-dials, and upcycled fire hose straps. The watch has a 48-hour power reserve, though the movement is often credited with up to 56 hours. Its 16.5mm height and 49.5mm lug-to-lug measurement mean it wears large on a 7-inch wrist, and the handset is described as flat and blocky. Overall, reviewers appreciate the novel design elements and thematic execution of the William Wood Triumph Chronograph.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









