Islander Islander x The Urban Gentry "Rangemaster II GMT" Limited Edition Watch #ISL-267vsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Islander x The Urban Gentry "Rangemaster II GMT" Limited Edition Watch #ISL-267 vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Islander x The Urban Gentry "Rangemaster II GMT" Limited Edition Watch #ISL-267 for its good fit and finish, unique design, and comfortable wearability, with many noting its integrated bracelet and case dimensions make it wear smaller than its specs suggest. Some owners find the dial cluttered and unbalanced, with specific criticism directed at the date window placement and the hour hand, while others appreciate the case's skeletonized lugs and the overall bold, retro-futuristic aesthetic. Accuracy figures range from +3.6s/day to more variable performance, and the crown is frequently described as slightly hard to manipulate due to its guards. On balance, owners value the Islander x The Urban Gentry "Rangemaster II GMT" Limited Edition Watch #ISL-267 for its originality and finishing at its price point, despite some polarizing design elements.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









