Side by side

Henry Archer TidevandvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Tidevand
Henry ArcherTidevand
MSRP $5,299
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Tidevand40mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Tidevand40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Tidevand200m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Tidevand$5,299
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Diver
Dress
Diameter
40mm
38mm
Thickness
10.65mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
42mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
200m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Grey
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9015
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$5,299
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Henry Archer Tidevand vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Henry Archer Tidevand

Owners widely praise the Henry Archer Tidevand for its exceptional finishing, highlighting the contrast between brushing and beveled polished edges, and its spectacular Aventurine dial, which evokes a sense of space. The BGW9 lume is described as "off the charts" and provides strong nighttime visibility, complementing the watch's rugged construction and refined aesthetic. The 40mm case is noted as being thin at 10.65mm, and the watch features a 120-click diver's bezel and 200 meters of water resistance. One owner reported tight bracelet push pins, but Henry Archer's customer service resolved the issue. On balance, owners rate the Henry Archer Tidevand highly for its striking Aventurine dial and robust lume.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.