Side by side

anOrdain Model 1vsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Model 1
anOrdainModel 1
MSRP $1,334
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Model 138mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Model 142h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Model 150m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Model 1$1,334
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

4 specs
Category
Dress
Thickness
11mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
42mm
Lug Width
18mm
20mm

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
AR Coating
Yes
Inner
Dial Color
Model 2
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

3 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW210-1
Seiko VJ76
Type
Manual
Solar
Power Reserve
42h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,334
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when anOrdain Model 1 vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

anOrdain Model 1

Owners and reviewers widely praise the anOrdain Model 2 for its exquisite, handmade Grand Feu enamel dial, custom typeface, and syringe hands, calling it a standout feature. The 36mm steel case is noted as a thoughtful, comfortable complement to the dial, and the smooth winding action of the Sellita SW-210-1 hand-wound movement is appreciated. Some find the 5atm water resistance limiting, and the anti-reflective coating can be prone to glare. The 18mm strap width is also mentioned as potentially limiting for strap enthusiasts. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the anOrdain Model 2 highly for its stunning enamel dial and elegant, versatile design.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.