Side by side

Hamilton Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second QuartzvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

10 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz40mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz$745
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

3 specs
Diameter
40mm
38mm
Thickness
7.35mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
42mm

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Grey
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
980.163
Seiko VJ76
Type
Quartz
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$745
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Hamilton Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Hamilton Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz

Owners widely praise the Hamilton Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz for its excellent value around $300, thin profile at 7mm to 8.4mm, and clean dial design with superb applied hour numerals and dauphine hands. One owner finds its champagne dial particularly upscale. However, the lume is considered terrible, barely lasting a few minutes, and the crown is noted as very small and difficult to manipulate. On balance, owners rate the Hamilton Jazzmaster Thinline Small Second Quartz highly for its thinness and clean dial design at the price.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.