Side by side

Hamilton Jazzmaster Gent QuartzvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Jazzmaster Gent Quartz
HamiltonJazzmaster Gent Quartz
MSRP $745
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

10 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Jazzmaster Gent Quartz40mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Jazzmaster Gent Quartz40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Jazzmaster Gent Quartz50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Jazzmaster Gent Quartz$745
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

3 specs
Diameter
40mm
38mm
Thickness
10.2mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
42mm

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Blue
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
F06.111
Seiko VJ76
Type
Quartz
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$745
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Hamilton Jazzmaster Gent Quartz vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Hamilton Jazzmaster Gent Quartz

Owners widely praise the Hamilton Jazzmaster Gent Quartz for its dressier, unique aesthetic, with specific admiration for the dark, iridescent dial and the machine-work on the minute markers. The 40mm size is considered suitable for smaller wrists, though lug-to-lug measurements are debated. Some owners find the open-heart dial busy and difficult to read due to silver lines resembling hands, and the skeleton version is also noted for excessive branding. The H-20-S movement in the skeleton model is thought to have a 42-hour power reserve. Overall, owners appreciate the Hamilton Jazzmaster Gent Quartz for its distinctive mid-century modern design and detailed finishing.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.