Glycine Airman GMTvsYema Navygraf CMM.10
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
19 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
6 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Glycine Airman GMT vs Yema Navygraf CMM.10 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely appreciate the Glycine Airman GMT's classic pilot design and consider it a well-built watch, with some noting the 39mm models offer perfect sizing and 200m water resistance. Reviewers praise the plexiglass crystal and matte dial, while some owners find the GMT hand visually similar to the minute hand, making it difficult to read. Accuracy from the Sellita-based movement is described as acceptable, though dial lume pips are noted as weaker than the hands. On balance, owners and reviewers value the Glycine Airman GMT for its faithful reproduction of a classic pilot watch design, despite some legibility concerns with the GMT hand.
Owners widely report quality control concerns and suspect craftsmanship with the Yema Navygraf, with one user noting crooked text. A reviewer praised the Slim CMM.20 Limited Edition for its stylish, slim profile and classy finishing on a black lacquered enamel dial, though the audible micro-rotor spinning at its price point was a surprise. On balance, the consensus is that while the Yema Navygraf offers a stylish design, potential buyers should be aware of reported quality control issues.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.












