Side by side

Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition)vsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Redcliff (Edwin Edition)
FearsRedcliff (Edwin Edition)
MSRP $511
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Redcliff (Edwin Edition)38mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Redcliff (Edwin Edition)40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Redcliff (Edwin Edition)5m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Redcliff (Edwin Edition)$511
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Category
Sport
Dress
Thickness
8.5mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
44.5mm
42mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
5m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Edwin Edition
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Ronda 512
Seiko VJ76
Type
Quartz
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$511
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition) vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition)

The Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition) is praised for its slim, sporty, and versatile design, featuring a well-finished 39.5mm case with a 9.95mm thickness and 150m water resistance. It is powered by a La Joux-Perret G100 automatic movement offering a 68-hour power reserve, tested to -/+7 seconds per day. The dial features contemporary baton markers and Super-LumiNova filled hands and markers. Overall, reviewers highlight the watch's refined build and sporty reimagining of the brand's debut model.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.