Fears Garrick (White)vsBoldr Safari
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
13 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Fears Garrick (White) vs Boldr Safari gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Fears Garrick (White) is noted for its curvaceous 42mm polished 904L steel case, measuring 10mm thick, and its Old English White dial featuring applied numerals and blued hands. Its Garrick UT-G04 in-house movement, visible through the caseback with hand-finished detailing, operates at 18,000vph and offers a 45-hour power reserve, regulated to +5 seconds per day. The watch includes a 100m water resistance rating and is produced in limited annual quantities. On balance, reviewers highlight the Garrick (White)'s distinctive case design and in-house movement as key attributes.
Owners widely praise the Boldr Safari for its attractive dials, robust build with 200 meters of water resistance, and reliable Seiko movements. The California dial design is a frequent highlight, as is the strong lume. Some owners note the GMT variant offers full GMT functionality, while others point out the movement's date-only nature on certain models leads to a vestigial crown position. The animal artwork on the display caseback is a point of contention, with some finding it detracts from the view of the movement. Overall, owners rate the Boldr Safari highly for its value and distinctive design elements.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









