Side by side

Fears Brunswick 40.5 Jump HourvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour
FearsBrunswick 40.5 Jump Hour
MSRP $4,498
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour40.5mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour10m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour$4,498
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
40.5mm
38mm
Thickness
12.8mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
42mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
10m
50m

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
Crystal
Domed Sapphire
Sapphire
Dial Color
Blue
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW200
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$4,498
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Fears Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Fears Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour

Owners widely praise the Fears Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour's stunning aventurine dial and vintage-modern aesthetic, with some noting excellent finishing. Reviewers highlight its fun dial visuals and unique in-house jump hour module. Owners are split on legibility with the jump hour complication, and some find the 12.8mm thickness substantial for some wrists. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Fears Brunswick 40.5 Jump Hour highly for its unique dial and jump hour complication, despite some concerns about thickness and legibility.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.