Side by side

Dan Henry 1975vsTudor 1926 41mm Automatic

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

1975
Dan Henry1975
MSRP $310
1926 41mm Automatic
Tudor1926 41mm Automatic
MSRP $2,650

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
197539mm
1926 41mm Automatic41mm
Power Reserve
197540h
1926 41mm Automatic38h
Water Resistance
1975150m
1926 41mm Automatic100m
MSRP
1975$310
1926 41mm Automatic$2,650

Full specifications

Case

9 specs
Category
Diver
Dress
Diameter
39mm
41mm
Thickness
10.5mm
9.1mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
46mm
Lug Width
20mm
15mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
Finish
Brushed and polished
Polished
Water Resistance
150m
100m
Caseback
Solid
Solid screw-down

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
White
Silver

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
T601
Power Reserve
40h
38h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$310
$2,650

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Dan Henry 1975 vs Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1975

Owners and reviewers praise the Dan Henry 1975 for its excellent value, retro styling, attractive dial with orange accents, and thin, wearable case. The bubble crystal is a highlight, though some find the lume weak. The Miyota 9015 movement offers hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve, with accuracy reported between -10/+30 seconds per day. The push-pull crown means it is not a true diver, and the black sapphire bezel can wash out in certain light. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Dan Henry 1975 highly for its retro charm and superb value.

Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic

Owners widely praise the Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic for its thin profile, comfortable wearability, and excellent value, with many appreciating its versatile strap potential and elegant aesthetic suitable for both dressy and everyday occasions. Reviewers and owners alike note its superb case and bracelet quality, improved finishing, and legibility compared to some alternatives, with some finding its 100m water resistance a practical benefit. However, the 42-hour power reserve necessitates regular winding, and some owners express a desire for an in-house movement, while others find the design bland or unoriginal, and the bracelet a weak point. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner reporting it not as accurate as their Pelagos, while another notes Tudor regulates its third-party movement to COSC standards.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.