Which is cheaper, the Dan Henry 1964 or the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze?

At MSRP the Dan Henry 1964 is the cheaper of the two at $300, against $599 for the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze — a $299 gap before any retailer discounting.

Which is bigger, the Dan Henry 1964 or the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze?

The Dan Henry 1964 wears larger at 38mm versus 35mm for the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze — a 3mm difference across the dial.

Which has a longer power reserve, the Dan Henry 1964 or the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze?

The KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze carries a 41-hour power reserve against 40 hours on the Dan Henry 1964.

What movement does the Dan Henry 1964 run compared to the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze?

The Dan Henry 1964 runs a quartz caliber, while the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze runs a automatic (NH38).

Side by side

Dan Henry 1964vsKUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Dan Henry 1964

DH64-38M-E1

MSRP $300

KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze

os90002nd-bz-br

MSRP $599

At a glance

15 of 29 specs differ

Diameter

196438mm

OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze35mm

Power Reserve

196440h

OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze41h

Water Resistance

1964—

OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze100m

MSRP

1964$300

OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze$599

Full specifications

Case

7 specs

Crystal & Dial

4 specs

Crystal Shape

Flat

Dome

AR Coating

Inner

Yes

Dial Color

White

Brown

Lume

None

Super-LumiNova

Movement

3 specs

Caliber

—

NH38

Type

Quartz

Automatic

Power Reserve

40h

41h

Pricing

1 specs

MSRP

$300

$599

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Dan Henry 1964 vs KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1964

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1964's 38mm case size as ideal for smaller wrists and its vintage panda execution as the best in its affordable price bracket, with build quality and finishing exceeding its $250 price point. Legibility is generally good, and the watch is considered excellent value. However, some owners report quality control issues like dust on the dial and crystal underside, sharp case edges, and subpar stock straps. The 19mm lug width limits strap options, and while the mineral crystal is durable for some, it is a concern for others. Subdial functions on the chronograph could be improved, and the date on the date version is hard to read. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1964 highly for its vintage panda execution and value at the $250 price point.

WatchUSeek·4

KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze

Owners widely praise the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze for its vintage military aesthetic and comfortable 35mm wearability, noting the lug design allows it to fit well on wrists around 7 inches. The Seiko NH-35 movement is reported to be reliable, keeping time within +2 to +3 seconds per day. Some owners dislike the 18mm lug width and the PVD coating on the NATO strap hardware, which does not match the bronze case. Overall, owners rate the KUOE OLD SMITH 90-002 Bronze highly for its vintage appeal and comfortable wearability.

From video reviewers

The watch's bronze case finish is a notable strength, with reviewers highlighting its unique patina and subtle aging effect. A weakness is the lume brightness, which may be a drawback for those who prioritize nighttime readability. Reviewers agree on the watch's movement accuracy, citing the reliable and accurate Seiko NH38 caliber.

WatchCrunch

WatchUSeek

Keep exploring