Side by side

Dan Henry 1964vsDan Henry 1972

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

1964
Dan Henry1964
MSRP $300
1972
Dan Henry1972
MSRP $370

At a glance

7 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
196438mm
197241mm
Power Reserve
196440h
197240h
Water Resistance
1964
1972
MSRP
1964$300
1972$370

Full specifications

Case

4 specs
Diameter
38mm
41mm
Thickness
12.9mm
12.7mm
Lug-to-Lug
44.7mm
45.7mm
Lug Width
19mm
20mm

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
White
Black

Movement

1 specs
Type
Quartz
Automatic

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$300
$370

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Dan Henry 1964 vs Dan Henry 1972 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1964

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1964's 38mm case size as ideal for smaller wrists and its vintage panda execution as the best in its affordable price bracket, with build quality and finishing exceeding its $250 price point. Legibility is generally good, and the watch is considered excellent value. However, some owners report quality control issues like dust on the dial and crystal underside, sharp case edges, and subpar stock straps. The 19mm lug width limits strap options, and while the mineral crystal is durable for some, it is a concern for others. Subdial functions on the chronograph could be improved, and the date on the date version is hard to read. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1964 highly for its vintage panda execution and value at the $250 price point.

Dan Henry 1972

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1972 Maverick for its cool retro style, 12-hour chronograph, sapphire crystal, and comfortable 40mm-equivalent wearability. The distinct chrono pusher clicks and the unique ability to turn off the running seconds are also noted strengths. However, the lume is not bright or evenly applied, and the alarm feature is considered poorly executed, with a quiet, short-lived alarm and a difficult-to-use pusher. One owner reported a negative customer service experience involving a dead quartz movement. Overall, owners rate the Dan Henry 1972 highly for its retro styling and value despite noted shortcomings in its lume and alarm functionality.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.