Side by side

Dan Henry 1962vsLum-Tec Combat Field

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

1962
Dan Henry1962
MSRP $280
Combat Field
Lum-TecCombat Field
MSRP $695

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
196239mm
Combat Field44mm
Power Reserve
196240h
Combat Field40h
Water Resistance
1962
Combat Field200m
MSRP
1962$280
Combat Field$695

Full specifications

Case

7 specs
Category
Chronograph
Sport
Diameter
39mm
44mm
Thickness
13.5mm
Lug-to-Lug
45.9mm
50mm
Lug Width
20mm
22mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Titanium
Water Resistance
200m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Crystal
Sapphire
Domed Sapphire
Dial Color
White
X6 Titanium GMT

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9075
Type
Quartz
Automatic

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$280
$695

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Dan Henry 1962 vs Lum-Tec Combat Field gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1962

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1962 for its legibility and attractive panda dial, noting its value under $300. However, some find its quartz chronograph functionality limited. One owner reports strap fitting difficulties due to tight tolerances and poor lume that fades quickly, with glowing sub-dial hands hindering legibility. Another owner describes black hands on black sub-dials as an issue for visibility. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1962 highly for its attractive panda dial and value, despite some concerns about its quartz chronograph functionality and legibility.

Lum-Tec Combat Field

Owners widely praise the Lum-Tec Combat Field for its rugged build and excellent lume, with one owner highlighting the bronze case and California dial as special features. The DLC coating is considered durable, and the PVD finish offers a "pure sport" blacked-out aesthetic. Some owners appreciate the modern look and design elements like skeleton hands and a 9 o'clock crown, noting that the 43mm case wears smaller than its dimensions suggest. One owner experienced an issue with a chronograph second hand not aligning correctly, a common quartz chronograph problem. On balance, owners rate the Lum-Tec Combat Field highly for its robust construction and distinctive design elements.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.