Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse ChampagnevsLongines MASTER COLLECTION
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne vs Longines MASTER COLLECTION gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne is widely praised for its Art Deco dial, described as "pure art deco with chevron-type design" and evoking a "Mad Men-style vibe," alongside its impressive build quality and craftsmanship for the price. Owners and reviewers highlight the smooth winding action of the Sellita SW300-1a movement, which is noted as being tuned to COSC specifications. However, the 38mm case size and the transition from case to bracelet are considered potentially divisive design choices by some. The dial itself elicits strong reactions, with one owner calling it "amazing" and "unique," while another found it visually unappealing. The watch measures 38mm wide, 44mm lug to lug, and 10.5mm thick, with a non-screw down crown and 100m water resistance. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne highly for its distinctive Art Deco aesthetic and excellent value.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Longines Master Collection for its excellent fit and finish, heritage-inspired design with features like Breguet numerals and leaf hands, and the value it offers, particularly for complications like chronographs and annual calendars. Specific models are noted for their beautiful dial execution, creamy white barleycorn or blue starburst finishes, and practical complications. Some owners find the Master Collection thin and dressy, appreciating its vintage aesthetic. However, drawbacks mentioned include a subdial potentially obscuring numerals, a bracelet lacking micro-adjustments causing fit issues for some, and a case finishing described as homogenous by one owner. The 30m water resistance on annual calendar models is considered light, and the crown and pushers on the moon phase chronograph are described as uninspiring. One owner reported a broken moon phase setting mechanism.
The diamond hour markers are a notable strength. The movement accuracy was not discussed.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









