Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse ChampagnevsFarer GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
18 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
9 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne vs Farer GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne is widely praised for its Art Deco dial, described as "pure art deco with chevron-type design" and evoking a "Mad Men-style vibe," alongside its impressive build quality and craftsmanship for the price. Owners and reviewers highlight the smooth winding action of the Sellita SW300-1a movement, which is noted as being tuned to COSC specifications. However, the 38mm case size and the transition from case to bracelet are considered potentially divisive design choices by some. The dial itself elicits strong reactions, with one owner calling it "amazing" and "unique," while another found it visually unappealing. The watch measures 38mm wide, 44mm lug to lug, and 10.5mm thick, with a non-screw down crown and 100m water resistance. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne highly for its distinctive Art Deco aesthetic and excellent value.
The Farer GMT Automatic is praised for its vibrant, legible sea-green sunburst dial and well-proportioned 39.5mm, 10mm thin case. The Top Grade ETA 2893-2 movement offers hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve. Reviewers note the bronze crown, intended to develop patina, as a potentially unpopular design choice. Overall, reviewers consider the Farer GMT Automatic good value at its price point, highlighting the dial and case proportions as key strengths.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









