Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse ChampagnevsGlycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
20 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
9 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne vs Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne is widely praised for its Art Deco dial, described as "pure art deco with chevron-type design" and evoking a "Mad Men-style vibe," alongside its impressive build quality and craftsmanship for the price. Owners and reviewers highlight the smooth winding action of the Sellita SW300-1a movement, which is noted as being tuned to COSC specifications. However, the 38mm case size and the transition from case to bracelet are considered potentially divisive design choices by some. The dial itself elicits strong reactions, with one owner calling it "amazing" and "unique," while another found it visually unappealing. The watch measures 38mm wide, 44mm lug to lug, and 10.5mm thick, with a non-screw down crown and 100m water resistance. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Cincinnati Watch Company Concourse Champagne highly for its distinctive Art Deco aesthetic and excellent value.
The Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze is widely praised for its exceptional value, slim profile, and attractive aesthetic development, with owners frequently highlighting its comfortable wearability and unique design. Its thin case, around 10.4-10.5mm, is a recurring point of admiration, fitting easily under cuffs. The ETA 2824 or SW200 movement is noted as reliable, with one owner reporting accuracy of +1.9 seconds per day. Lume is generally considered strong, comparable to a Seiko SKX007, though one source noted it as subpar. Some owners expressed a desire for ceramic bezel inserts, while others preferred the aluminum for its thinner profile. A few specific criticisms include a non-bronze buckle, the potential for uneven patina from seawater exposure, and inconsistent power reserve not always reaching the advertised 42 hours. Overall, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze highly for its ruggedness and value, making it a compelling choice for a durable diver's watch.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









