Side by side

CIGA Design CRYSTAL LOVEvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

CRYSTAL LOVE
CIGA DesignCRYSTAL LOVE
MSRP $399
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
CRYSTAL LOVE
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
CRYSTAL LOVE
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
CRYSTAL LOVE30m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
CRYSTAL LOVE$399
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Diameter
38mm
Thickness
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
Lug Width
20mm
Material
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
30m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Crystal
Mineral
Sapphire
Lume
Swiss Super-LumiNova
Luminova Punkten

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
Miyota Automatic
Seiko VJ76
Type
Solar

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$399
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when CIGA Design CRYSTAL LOVE vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

CIGA Design CRYSTAL LOVE

Owners widely praise the CIGA Design CRYSTAL LOVE for its striking dial details and significant wrist presence. However, legibility is frequently cited as a challenge, even with generational improvements. Strap options are limited, with the watch being particular about compatible pairings. On balance, owners rate the CIGA Design CRYSTAL LOVE highly for its visually arresting dial and unique aesthetic, despite the legibility and strap limitations.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.