CIGA Design BLUE PLANET IIvsHamilton Khaki Navy GMT Auto
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when CIGA Design BLUE PLANET II vs Hamilton Khaki Navy GMT Auto gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the CIGA Design BLUE PLANET II for its unique, detailed Earth dial design, which is considered well-executed for its price point and frequently garners compliments and sparks conversations. The watch is noted for its comfort, particularly with the soft rubber strap, and its titanium variant is praised for lightness. The dial's three-dimensional Earth map, created with a CNC process for exaggerated topography, is a significant aesthetic feature, with some models including micro-engraved details. The watch utilizes a Miyota 8000-series movement, with one source stating a stated accuracy of -15/+30 seconds per day, while another mentions a Swiss-made CD-04-E automatic movement with a 40-hour power reserve. However, legibility remains a consistent challenge for the CIGA Design BLUE PLANET II, with owners finding it difficult to read the time despite dial improvements and larger, luminescent indices on the hour and minute rings.
The Hamilton Khaki Navy GMT Auto is widely praised for its true GMT function and 80-hour power reserve, with owners noting its excellent quality for the price. Reviewers highlight its legible syringe hands and Arabic numerals, well-functioning inner bezel, and comfortable wearability due to its 12.5mm thickness and brushed case finishing. Some owners report minor cosmetic flaws like paint chips or scrapes, and accuracy figures vary, with one owner seeing -5 seconds per day and another noting +5 seconds per 24 hours. The 43mm case is 13.9mm thick, and while some find the slab-sided profile mitigates the perceived height, others note the lug-to-lug measurement can be a stumbling block. The movement is described as nicely decorated, though one owner notes a loud rotor sound, and the lack of AR coating on the sapphire crystal is a drawback for some.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









