Side by side

CIGA Design EVEREST SUMMITvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

EVEREST SUMMIT
CIGA DesignEVEREST SUMMIT
MSRP $2,699
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
EVEREST SUMMIT45mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
EVEREST SUMMIT120h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
EVEREST SUMMIT50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
EVEREST SUMMIT$2,699
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Skeleton
Dress
Diameter
45mm
38mm
Thickness
11.65mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
Lug Width
20mm
Material
Titanium
Stainless Steel

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Lume
Super-LumiNova®
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
CD-05
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
120h
Jewels
33

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$2,699
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when CIGA Design EVEREST SUMMIT vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

CIGA Design EVEREST SUMMIT

The CIGA Design EVEREST SUMMIT features a 45mm Grade-5 titanium case with alternating brushed and polished finishes and crisp bezel tolerances. Its dial is crafted from processed Everest bedrock, showcasing a raised relief filled with Super-LumiNova C1, complemented by ice-axe-shaped hands also treated with Super-LumiNova. The manual-winding central tourbillon movement provides a 120-hour power reserve. On balance, reviewers highlight the unique Everest bedrock dial and ice-axe hands as distinctive design elements of the CIGA Design EVEREST SUMMIT.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.