CWC Cabot Falcon Quartz Chronograph WatchvsTornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Profile favors the Cabot Falcon Quartz Chronograph Watch at 12mm thick versus 14.7mm on the TR-660 Aluminum Non-date, so it slips under a cuff with less fuss.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the CWC Cabot Falcon Quartz Chronograph Watch for its domed sapphire crystal and brushed/satin case finish, which contribute to a vintage aesthetic. The case design with wider lugs is noted for providing a beefier, improved appearance. Some owners question the value at over $800, while others defend the price, citing its Swiss-made origin, low production, and collectibility from a respected brand.
Owners praise the Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date for its crisp dial and bead-blasted case, with one owner finding it extremely well built and a relief to wear. The watch features a 40mm 316L stainless steel case and a black aluminum bezel inlay. However, the bezel action is considered not brilliant and the included straps are scratchy. Overall, owners find the Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date to be a well-executed piece with a pleasing aesthetic, despite minor drawbacks in the bezel feel and strap quality.
Check prices & track
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when CWC Cabot Falcon Quartz Chronograph Watch vs Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.