Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine GMTvsHamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
13 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine GMT vs Hamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine GMT is widely praised for its vintage aesthetic, featuring a "Beach Sand" dial, box sapphire crystal, and a contrasting blue ceramic bezel. Owners and reviewers alike highlight its beautiful design, noting it appears even better in person than in press photos, with a highly polished sapphire bezel insert and warm ivory font that precisely matches the dial's lume pods. The 41mm case size is considered a positive downsize, and its 200m water resistance, combined with a lightweight and rugged build, makes it a versatile traveler. The date at 6 o'clock is noted for providing balance and elegance. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine GMT highly for its stunning vintage design and versatile, robust build.
The Hamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze is widely praised for its excellent fit and finish, pleasing proportions with a 22mm lug width, and a matte dial that minimizes glare. Owners appreciate its 300 meters of water resistance, 80-hour power reserve from the H-14 automatic GMT movement, and the fact that it wears smaller than its 43mm size suggests. Some owners find the flush crown guards and rock-solid feel make it an outstanding beater dive watch. However, opinions are split on the date placement, dial markers, and logo text size, with some preferring a cleaner look and faster setting due to the lack of a date window, while others note the absence of a lumed bezel pip. One owner dislikes the trade-offs for the 80-hour power reserve, preferring a smoother second hand sweep and more torque, and finds the bezel action tight.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









