Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine Bronze COSCvsYema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine Bronze COSC vs Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine Bronze COSC for its comfortable wearability, durable case and bezel, and smooth winding action, with one owner finding its case superior to a Tudor's. However, accuracy is a significant concern, with one owner reporting +17 seconds per day. The rubber strap is also noted as lacking refinement, and some suggest design tweaks for greater brand uniqueness. Overall, owners rate the Christopher Ward C65 Aquitaine Bronze COSC highly for its wearability and case finishing, despite accuracy concerns with the Sellita SW330-2 movement.
The Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20 is praised for its elegant and slim case design, measuring between 9.5mm and 9.75mm thick, and its unique mother-of-pearl dial and bezel. The watch features functional dive watch elements like 200-meter water resistance and is powered by the in-house CMM.20 micro-rotor movement, which offers a 70-hour power reserve and is adjusted to -3/+7 seconds a day. Overall, reviewers highlight the Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20's sophisticated aesthetic and slim profile as its primary strengths.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.