Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited EditionvsLongines MASTER COLLECTION
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
22 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
9 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
7 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition vs Longines MASTER COLLECTION gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition is widely praised for its well-executed Light-catcher titanium case and comfortable 41mm build, with owners highlighting its excellent bezel and crown action and overall finishing quality. The spectacular Globolight lume on the dial and hands offers a bright, even glow and legibility, ultimately winning over initial reservations about the large markers. Some reviewers note that the end links can appear slightly longer than the lugs, and one owner expressed a preference for grade 5 titanium over grade 2 for improved scratch resistance. The watch is powered by a COSC-certified Sellita SW300-1 movement with a 56-hour power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Christopher Ward C60 Trident Lumière Limited Edition highly for its impressive lume and exceptional case finishing at its price point.
The watch features a unique dial that provides a good experience in both day and night conditions. One weakness is the relatively high price point of the watch, especially when compared to other divers in the market. Reviewers disagree on the significance of the watch's ultra-slim design.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Longines Master Collection for its excellent fit and finish, heritage-inspired design with features like Breguet numerals and leaf hands, and the value it offers, particularly for complications like chronographs and annual calendars. Specific models are noted for their beautiful dial execution, creamy white barleycorn or blue starburst finishes, and practical complications. Some owners find the Master Collection thin and dressy, appreciating its vintage aesthetic. However, drawbacks mentioned include a subdial potentially obscuring numerals, a bracelet lacking micro-adjustments causing fit issues for some, and a case finishing described as homogenous by one owner. The 30m water resistance on annual calendar models is considered light, and the crown and pushers on the moon phase chronograph are described as uninspiring. One owner reported a broken moon phase setting mechanism.
The diamond hour markers are a notable strength. The movement accuracy was not discussed.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









