Which is cheaper, the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 or the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement?

At MSRP the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 is the cheaper of the two at $1,320, against $26,667 for the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement — a $25,347 gap before any retailer discounting.

Which is bigger, the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 or the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement?

The Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement wears larger at 44mm versus 40mm for the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 — a 4mm difference across the dial.

Which has better water resistance, the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 or the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement?

The Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 is rated to 300m versus 100m for the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement.

Which has a longer power reserve, the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 or the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement?

The Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement carries a 42-hour power reserve against 38 hours on the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300.

What movement does the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 run compared to the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement?

Both watches run automatic movements — the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 uses the SW200-1 and the Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement uses the LW07.

Side by side

Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300vsLinde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300

C60-40ADA31S00W1-B0

MSRP $1,320

Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement

spidolite-3dtp-carbon

MSRP $26,667

At a glance

14 of 29 specs differ

Diameter

C60 Atoll 30040mm

Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement44mm

Power Reserve

C60 Atoll 30038h

Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement42h

Water Resistance

C60 Atoll 300300m

Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement100m

MSRP

C60 Atoll 300$1,320

Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement$26,667

Full specifications

Case

6 specs

Crystal & Dial

2 specs

Dial Color

White

Skeleton

Lume

SLN X1 BL C1

Superluminova

Movement

5 specs

Caliber

SW200-1

LW07

Beat Rate

4 vph

28,800 vph

Power Reserve

38h

42h

Jewels

Complications

Day-date, Date

None

Pricing

1 specs

MSRP

$1,320

$26,667

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 vs Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300

Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 for its superb fit and finish, which reviewers note exceeds its price point, and its comfortable 40mm wearability. The Sellita SW200-1 movement is reported to run close to COSC standards, and the "light catcher" case is frequently highlighted for its jewelry-like quality and beautiful dial that is better appreciated in person. One owner desires a larger 42mm size option, and some users flag a weak or missing anti-reflective coating on the crystal. Overall, owners rate the Christopher Ward C60 Atoll 300 highly for its exceptional case finishing and value.

WatchCrunch·2

Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement

The Linde Werdelin Spidolite 3DTP Carbon – 3D Movement is lauded for its exceptionally light 90-gram weight and comfortable wearability, attributed to its 3DTP carbon case. Reviewers note its unique design and comfortable strap contribute to a feeling of disappearance on the wrist during activities. However, the crown is described as difficult to operate, particularly with gloves, and legibility is impacted by skeletonized hands, with lume considered insufficient for optimal night visibility. This model is priced at CHF 19,000. On balance, reviewers highlight the watch's remarkable lightness and comfort as its primary strengths, despite noted drawbacks in crown operation and legibility.

A Blog to Watch·2

Keep exploring