Christopher Ward The Twelve 660vsHenry Archer Tidslinje

Christopher Ward The Twelve 660 owners widely appreciate its thin 6.6mm case, achieved partly by reducing bezel and caseback diameters, and its well-made construction and value proposition. However, the community is split on the manual wind and lack of a second hand, with some finding these features unnecessary while others enjoy the interaction and thinness they enable. The bracelet's butterfly clasp lacks micro-adjustments, and some find the 30m water resistance limiting. Overall, owners and reviewers rate Christopher Ward The Twelve 660 highly for its innovative thin case design and perceived value, despite differing opinions on its manual-wind-only, no-date configuration.

Owners widely praise the Henry Archer Tidslinje for its superb build quality, captivating dial designs, and comfortable wearability, with many highlighting its 40mm size and 12.1mm thickness as very wearable. The triple date function is appreciated for its utility and collection variety, and the beads of rice bracelet is frequently noted for its comfort and quality. Accuracy figures vary, with some owners reporting +/- 2-4 seconds per day and others around 10-15 seconds per day as advertised. Some owners find the day/month indicators and the numbering for days of the week to be tiny and hard to read, and the black bezel is considered disproportionately large and cosmetic by some. One owner noted disappointment that a micro-adjust clasp is no longer offered on the Lunaris model. Overall, owners rate the Henry Archer Tidslinje highly for its captivating design and excellent value for money.