Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40vsGlycine Combat Sub Sport
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
16 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 vs Glycine Combat Sub Sport gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 for its captivating aventurine dial and photorealistic, luminescent moon, with many receiving compliments and finding it a stylish, lightweight, and comfortable daily wear. The in-house Calibre JJ04 module's 128-year moon tracking is a notable feature. However, multiple owners find the lack of dial indices and bezel markings, along with unlumed hands, makes precise time-telling difficult, with some describing it as more of a jewelry piece than a functional timepiece. One owner experienced a movement issue requiring warranty repair within the first year, and another noted frustration with customer service. The 40.5mm case size is considered sporty by some, and the design is described as "shouty" by a few. On balance, owners highly rate the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 for its stunning moonphase display and aesthetic appeal at its price point, despite legibility concerns.
The aventurine dial and Globolight lume are praised for their realistic starry night effect. The 3 ATM water resistance is a significant limitation.
Owners widely praise the Glycine Combat Sub Sport for its exceptional thinness, with multiple sources noting profiles between 10.4mm and 11mm, comfortable wearability on a variety of wrist sizes due to its proportions and contoured lugs, and its value, especially when found under $400. Some owners highlight its refined finishing and unique, non-homage design, while others appreciate its ruggedness and durability, with one noting PVD coating remained flawless after three years of heavy use. Accuracy figures range from excellent, with one owner reporting only 2 seconds lost per day, to inconsistent power reserve and occasional reported issues with the movement and stem. The lume is described as subpar by some, though one owner found it marginally better than a Seiko SKX007. Reservations are occasionally raised regarding warranty service and the use of folded end links on the bracelet.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









