Bremont S500vsHenry Archer Tidslinje
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Bremont S500 vs Henry Archer Tidslinje gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Bremont S500's excellent Super-LumiNova lume and refined finishing, with many finding its 43mm case comfortable and versatile on the wrist due to short lugs and an offset crown. Reviewers and owners alike note its handsome, rugged design and improved dial legibility for diving. However, some find the 16mm to 16.5mm thickness less practical for daily wear, and one reviewer flags legibility issues with the dark dial and hands. Concerns are raised by one source regarding the three-piece case construction's long-term water resistance for actual diving, while another criticizes the understated bezel markings and the second hand's visibility in low light. The COSC-certified ETA 2836-2 movement provides a 38-hour power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Bremont S500 highly for its distinctive design and robust build quality, despite some reservations about its thickness and specific legibility elements.
Owners widely praise the Henry Archer Tidslinje for its superb build quality, captivating dial designs, and comfortable wearability, with many highlighting its 40mm size and 12.1mm thickness as very wearable. The triple date function is appreciated for its utility and collection variety, and the beads of rice bracelet is frequently noted for its comfort and quality. Accuracy figures vary, with some owners reporting +/- 2-4 seconds per day and others around 10-15 seconds per day as advertised. Some owners find the day/month indicators and the numbering for days of the week to be tiny and hard to read, and the black bezel is considered disproportionately large and cosmetic by some. One owner noted disappointment that a micro-adjust clasp is no longer offered on the Lunaris model. Overall, owners rate the Henry Archer Tidslinje highly for its captivating design and excellent value for money.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










