Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic ChronovsLongines MASTER COLLECTION
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
21 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
7 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono vs Longines MASTER COLLECTION gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono is praised for its excellent case finishing, high-quality dial with applied indices, and generous BGW9 lume, with reviewers and owners noting its well-proportioned 39mm dimensions and balanced dial. The black rubber strap is considered surprisingly nice, and the watch offers a competitive package at $1,970. However, the chronograph pushers are not screw-down despite their appearance, and the 100m water resistance should not be used with the chronograph engaged. The 51.5mm lug-to-lug distance is noted as potentially problematic for smaller wrists, and the engagement of the Sellita SW200 movement is described as unremarkable, with the Oyster-style bracelet considered only of reasonable quality. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono highly for its sharp design and quality finishing at its price point.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Longines Master Collection for its excellent fit and finish, heritage-inspired design with features like Breguet numerals and leaf hands, and the value it offers, particularly for complications like chronographs and annual calendars. Specific models are noted for their beautiful dial execution, creamy white barleycorn or blue starburst finishes, and practical complications. Some owners find the Master Collection thin and dressy, appreciating its vintage aesthetic. However, drawbacks mentioned include a subdial potentially obscuring numerals, a bracelet lacking micro-adjustments causing fit issues for some, and a case finishing described as homogenous by one owner. The 30m water resistance on annual calendar models is considered light, and the crown and pushers on the moon phase chronograph are described as uninspiring. One owner reported a broken moon phase setting mechanism.
The diamond hour markers are a notable strength. The movement accuracy was not discussed.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









