Which is cheaper, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch?

At MSRP the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch is the cheaper of the two at $539, against $1,249 for the Astor + Banks Pilomatic — a $710 gap before any retailer discounting.

Which is bigger, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch?

The Astor + Banks Pilomatic wears larger at 42mm versus 40mm for the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch — a 2mm difference across the dial.

Which has better water resistance, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch?

The Astor + Banks Pilomatic is rated to 200m versus 100m for the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch.

What movement does the Astor + Banks Pilomatic run compared to the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch?

The Astor + Banks Pilomatic runs a automatic caliber (Sellita SW200), while the Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch runs a manual.

Side by side

Astor + Banks PilomaticvsAevig THOR manualwind dresswatch

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Astor + Banks Pilomatic

pilomatic-b2

MSRP $1,249

Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch

thor

MSRP $539

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ

Diameter

Pilomatic42mm

THOR manualwind dresswatch40mm

Power Reserve

Pilomatic40h

THOR manualwind dresswatch40h

Water Resistance

Pilomatic200m

THOR manualwind dresswatch100m

MSRP

Pilomatic$1,249

THOR manualwind dresswatch$539

Full specifications

Case

6 specs

Crystal & Dial

2 specs

Dial Color

Black

Lume

None

Superluminova

Movement

2 specs

Caliber

Sellita SW200

—

Type

Automatic

Manual

Pricing

1 specs

MSRP

$1,249

$539

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Astor + Banks Pilomatic vs Aevig THOR manualwind dresswatch gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

Keep exploring