Which is cheaper, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage?

At MSRP the Astor + Banks Pilomatic is the cheaper of the two at $1,249, against $1,550 for the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage — a $301 gap before any retailer discounting.

Which has better water resistance, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage?

The Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage is rated to 300m versus 200m for the Astor + Banks Pilomatic.

Which has a longer power reserve, the Astor + Banks Pilomatic or the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage?

The Astor + Banks Pilomatic carries a 40-hour power reserve against 38 hours on the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage.

What movement does the Astor + Banks Pilomatic run compared to the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage?

Both watches run automatic movements — the Astor + Banks Pilomatic uses the Sellita SW200 and the Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage uses the SW200.

Side by side

Astor + Banks PilomaticvsChristopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Astor + Banks Pilomatic

pilomatic-b2

MSRP $1,249

Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage

C60-42ADC31B0KK0-VT1

MSRP $1,550

At a glance

15 of 29 specs differ

Diameter

Pilomatic42mm

C60 Pro 300 Vintage42mm

Power Reserve

Pilomatic40h

C60 Pro 300 Vintage38h

Water Resistance

Pilomatic200m

C60 Pro 300 Vintage300m

MSRP

Pilomatic$1,249

C60 Pro 300 Vintage$1,550

Full specifications

Case

8 specs

Crystal & Dial

1 specs

Dial Color

Brown

Movement

5 specs

Caliber

Sellita SW200

SW200

Beat Rate

28,800 vph

4 vph

Power Reserve

40h

38h

Jewels

Complications

None

Moonphase, Day-date, Date

Pricing

1 specs

MSRP

$1,249

$1,550

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Astor + Banks Pilomatic vs Christopher Ward C60 Pro 300 Vintage gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

Keep exploring