Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsDOXA SUB 200 C-GRAPH II
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs DOXA SUB 200 C-GRAPH II gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
The DOXA SUB 200 C-Graph II is widely praised for its improved wearability with a 42mm case size and flatter lugs, a significant downsizing from its predecessor. Reviewers and owners highlight its fantastic finishing, sharp contrasts, and smooth crown action, with one owner noting exceptional accuracy of +1 second per day even after drops. The watch retains 200m water resistance and features updated sun-brushed dials, a ceramic bezel option, and Super-LumiNova accents. It is powered by the Sellita SW510 movement, offering a 56-hour power reserve. Prices range from $2,850 to $2,990 USD. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the DOXA SUB 200 C-Graph II highly for its refined finishing and more wearable dimensions at its price point.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










