Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsPagani Design PD-1682 GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
10 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs Pagani Design PD-1682 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
Owners widely praise the Pagani Design PD-1682 GMT for its exceptional value, noting a well-finished 316L stainless steel case, sapphire crystal, and 100m water resistance. The bracelet and clasp are frequently cited as solid and comfortable, with one owner reporting zero issues after two years of daily wear and swimming. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner observing around 10 seconds per day and another at +12 seconds per day, while another found the NH34 movement's operation crisp and smooth. Some owners note minor finish imperfections, such as a misaligned GMT hand and weak dial lume, though hand lume is considered better. Overall, owners rate the Pagani Design PD-1682 GMT highly for its impressive build quality and wearability at its price point.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











