Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsPagani Design PD-1689
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs Pagani Design PD-1689 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
Owners widely praise the Pagani Design PD-1689 for its clean dial, minimal fluted bezel, and smooth case finishing, with sapphire crystal and 200m water resistance making it surprisingly wearable as a dress watch. The watch is considered well-executed for its price. A significant and recurring friction point is the tight lug design: standard straight springbars are difficult to fit, and owners report both leather and rubber straps remain in constant contact with the case, raising concerns about scratching; curved springbars are required. One owner also questioned the strap feel itself. Hand-to-index alignment is imprecise, and the dial lacks lume. Overall, the Pagani Design PD-1689 is valued for its clean aesthetics and finishing at the price, though the tight lug design and hand alignment are concrete trade-offs for those considering it.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











