Side by side

Sinn 358 DIAPALvsDan Henry 1972

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

358 DIAPAL
Sinn358 DIAPAL
MSRP $4,255
1972
Dan Henry1972
MSRP $370

At a glance

19 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
358 DIAPAL42mm
197241mm
Power Reserve
358 DIAPAL48h
197240h
Water Resistance
358 DIAPAL100m
1972
MSRP
358 DIAPAL$4,255
1972$370

Full specifications

Case

9 specs
Category
Tool
Chronograph
Diameter
42mm
41mm
Thickness
15mm
12.7mm
Lug-to-Lug
45.7mm
Lug Width
22mm
20mm
Material
Stainless Steel
316L Stainless Steel
Finish
satinized
Brushed and polished
Water Resistance
100m
Caseback
Solid

Crystal & Dial

5 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
AR Coating
Underside
Inner
Dial Color
Anthracite
Black
Indices
Applied
Lume
Luminescent
None

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
LJP L100
Power Reserve
48h
40h
Jewels
26
25
Complications
GMT, Date, Chronograph
None

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$4,255
$370

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Sinn 358 DIAPAL vs Dan Henry 1972 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Sinn 358 DIAPAL

The Sinn 358 DIAPAL is widely praised as a handsome, unfussy tool watch with excellent legibility and solid construction, featuring a reliable and exact second timezone complication. Owners and reviewers highlight its DIAPAL oil-free escapement and Ar-Dehumidifying technology for contributing to its accuracy, and note the 42mm brushed stainless steel case is well-sized. One reviewer flags the skeletonized GMT hand as sometimes lacking legibility. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Sinn 358 DIAPAL highly for its robust build and practical travel watch functionality.

Dan Henry 1972

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1972 Maverick for its cool retro style, 12-hour chronograph, sapphire crystal, and comfortable 40mm-equivalent wearability. The distinct chrono pusher clicks and the unique ability to turn off the running seconds are also noted strengths. However, the lume is not bright or evenly applied, and the alarm feature is considered poorly executed, with a quiet, short-lived alarm and a difficult-to-use pusher. One owner reported a negative customer service experience involving a dead quartz movement. Overall, owners rate the Dan Henry 1972 highly for its retro styling and value despite noted shortcomings in its lume and alarm functionality.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.