CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue WatchvsSeiko 5KX
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely report the CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch as very hard-wearing, with good seconds hand alignment and perfect bezel alignment with crisp action. The lume is described as pretty good despite fauxtina, and the watch gains approximately 3 seconds per month. Some owners consider the CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch overpriced, while others appreciate its bombproof, toolish design and military heritage.
Owners widely praise the Seiko 5 Sports SKX series for its strong lume and comfortable wearability, with many noting its compact feel due to a short lug-to-lug length. The NH36 movement's accuracy varies, with typical performance between +/-5 to 10 seconds per day, though some report better. A lack of screw-down crown and ISO certification are noted drawbacks for its water resistance. Some owners find the bracelet to be of cheaper construction with hollow links, and a few have reported quality control issues. The consensus is that the Seiko 5 Sports SKX series offers good value for its price, appealing to those who appreciate its tool-like nature and iconic lineage.
At a glance
13 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsMore watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Follow this matchup
Get a note when CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch vs Seiko 5KX gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










